|
|  |
|
|
|
| |
| Mar 31, 2009 5:11 pm |
|
re: re: AIG Outrage |
Reg Charie
| |
I would like to inject a few comments here.
Please confine your comments to discussing the problems and do not attack the poster on a personal level.
"That's causes me to think that you haven't taken off your rose coloured glasses yet." has no place in an intelligent discussion.
Michael, no matter how well you know your "neighbor from a few miles away" you have no way to discern what his actual motives are, or who is 'paying' him (if anyone), or if he is straight as an arrow, slightly or considerably bent.
You can form an opinion, but that is ALL it is.. You would have to be inside his head to know otherwise.
Scott, the network is open to all.. One does not have to live in the US to comment on the problems.
One of the things that concerned me about the AIG bonuses is the total lack of information as to who and why the bonuses are being paid.
What if a recipient has, despite the financial crisis, gone well past the expected and done a superb job?
Should this person be denied his performance bonus? It IS possible for a company to be losing money while some departments are exceeding targets.
Reg - NEW DEMO!! Turn photos into paintings http://FantasticMachines.com
All You Need is Dotcom-Productions and a Dream. http://dotcom-productions.com
0Grief http://0grief.com/special_hosting_accounts_for_my_ryze_friends.htm
CRELoaded websites http://RegCharie.com - SBTT http://thinktank-network.ryze.comPrivate Reply to Reg Charie (new win) |
|
| |
|
